So, I have citizenship to two countries, one being the USA which requires a visa. I am currently living in another country of which I also have citizenship which does not require a visa. I would prefer not to waste my time and work going to the consulate just for a question.

I know I can enter Russia on the passport I have in this country but am I required by law to disclose my US citizenship? They would be able to tell that I am not a natural citizen of this country without the visa given that my English and accent will be as if I just arrived from the USA.

  • 1
    As a side note, many, if not most, non-native English speakers "sound American" so I don't think you will sound too unusual :) – josh Sep 10 '18 at 14:51
  • 3
    @josh to an American ear, very few non-native English speakers sound American, if any. – phoog Sep 10 '18 at 15:22
  • 2
    Maybe, but I doubt there will be many American's working at Russia's border control. – josh Sep 10 '18 at 15:25
  • 1
    My point is, if Gregorsky provides a valid passport for vista free entry, an American sounding English speaking accent will not likely prompt the question of "Are you American?". – josh Sep 10 '18 at 15:27
  • 2
    @josh I don't think any native English speaker would think that non-native speakers generally "sound American", so it would be strange if non-native speakers think they do. Especially since non-native speakers don't seem to have a hard time distinguishing British accents from American ones. – David Richerby Sep 10 '18 at 16:36

Even if you had to disclose your US citizenship (which you don't), it won't make you ineligible for visa-free entry with your other passport. Why would it?

Citizenship is not a taint, as in, you are "tainted" with US citizenship and therefore require a visa. Citizenship is a grant, as in, if you're granted "some country" citizenship you don't require a visa.

I know that some Middle Eastern states see citizenship as a taint vs. Israel, but this is not the case generally and this isn't the case with Russia.

  • 21
    While this is true as a general rule, and I suppose it probably is also true in this specific case, it isn't universally true. A country can make a rule that citizens of country X require a visa regardless of other citizenships. One country that has made such a rule is the US. – phoog Sep 10 '18 at 15:25
  • "Why would it?" Why wouldn't it? If citizens of country X require a visa and citizens of country Y don't, it would make just as much sense for either one could take priority for X-Y dual nationals. – David Richerby Sep 10 '18 at 16:30
  • @DavidRicherby For starters, there's a solid, legally binding, proof of first citizenship at immigration booth, but there's no proof of dual nationality. If there's a country with which you have bilateral agreement to accept each other's citizens without visa, and then you don't let a person with their passport in for handwavy reasons, that's a transgression of agreement. – alamar Sep 10 '18 at 16:33
  • 1
    "Even if you had to disclose your US citizenship (which you don't)" Incorrect! Russia specifically has reporting requirements and it is a criminal offense to knowingly conceal dual citizenship. – user71659 Sep 10 '18 at 19:45
  • 2
    @user71659 It's a criminal offense for Russians to knowingly conceal dual citizenship -- this is not the same at all as requiring visitors to. – lambshaanxy Sep 10 '18 at 20:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.