US law regulating the issuance or refusal of visa applications requires the officer examining the application to presume that the applicant has immigrant intent. A successful visa application must disprove this presumption. Proving a negative is logically impossible, and in the real world very difficult.
The most powerful evidence is what @Harper - Reinstate Monica mentions as a well-established life. In other words, such strong ties to one's country of citizenship or residence that the applicant will not overstay in the US and will return home after the US visit. These factors can include the applicant's having an ongoing, valuable, and long-term employment, owning a well-established business, the ownership or long-term lease or rental of real property where the applicant resides, and family connections such as children, parents, and long-term spouse who rely on the applicant (both fiscally and emotionally) and to whom the applicant will be compelled to return.
Personal bank accounts that reflect long-term, regular, and predictable deposits and withdrawals consonant with the applicant's description of work, salary, and costs of living will be helpful.
Owning property in which the applicant doesn't live is much less persuasive, as is savings and other assets. All of these can be managed remotely or converted to cash and made portable. They will add little or nothing to your application.
Even if you demonstrate compelling reasons to return to your country of residence after the visit, as described in this Answer, your application for a visitor visa may well be denied because of your US immigration history.