Timeline for London Transit Visa for US to Indian with Valid US H4 Visa
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2014 at 7:40 | comment | added | Aditya Somani | @Relaxed Yes, you are absolutely correct. I kind of agree now that my interpretation of only this sentence is uncommon. I'll edit the answer to add the other sentence as well and add a written clarification for future users. | |
| Aug 9, 2014 at 7:38 | comment | added | Relaxed | @AditySomani It sounds like a reasonable interpretation and could presumably be a way to deal with people returning from the US without valid visa (as that's not required to stay in the US if you have valid status) but it's phrased somehwat more clearly, e.g., in Schengen regulations. That's precisely what I find confusing about the website. | |
| Aug 9, 2014 at 7:35 | comment | added | Aditya Somani | Well you are right per se. But I perceived it as - as long as your visa has not expired more than 6 months ago. If you still have a valid visa and you are allowed to go "to" the country without a transit visa, you are allowed to come without a transit visa as well it seems. I say this because I have tried this in practice and know many others who have as well (all Indian citizens with F1 visas) | |
| Aug 9, 2014 at 7:13 | comment | added | Relaxed | But that's not what the sentence you're quoting is saying?! What about the “6 months since you last entered that country” clause? | |
| Aug 9, 2014 at 5:28 | history | answered | Aditya Somani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |