Timeline for Canadian citizen who is presently in litigation with a US-based company
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2019 at 18:04 | history | edited | DavidRecallsMonica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added mention of US immigration not caring about civil disputes
|
| May 15, 2019 at 18:01 | comment | added | DavidRecallsMonica | I thought about that, but while I think and am certain that the US immigration authorities won't know or care about this sort of thing, I can't assert that from any personal knowledge or experience. But sure, in for a penny in for a pound. I'll add it. | |
| May 15, 2019 at 17:00 | comment | added | phoog | Sure, it's okay. I'm just suggesting that you add a sentence saying that there won't be any impediment to entering the US. Then it would be better :-) | |
| May 15, 2019 at 16:57 | comment | added | DavidRecallsMonica | @phoog I agree, it doesn't. Early in my participation here, I made the same objection to someone else's Answer, and was promptly rebuked on the grounds that the answer expanded the OP's knowledge of the field, and by "furthering the answer" was therefore OK. I think this information is sufficiently related and useful to clear that bar. | |
| May 15, 2019 at 16:52 | comment | added | phoog | While this is excellent and helpful information, it doesn't seem to address the (implied?) question of whether the asker could be denied admission to the US because of this litigation. Also, couldn't personal service of court papers be made in Canada? Presumably they know where the asker lives. Does vacationing in the US actually increase the risk of being served? | |
| May 15, 2019 at 16:06 | history | answered | DavidRecallsMonica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |