Timeline for Deported form US twice, visiting England
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2019 at 16:15 | comment | added | pipe | I'm thinking that a document that says that you live in a house where the monthly fee exceeds your monthly salary might be detrimental to your cause. It kinda signals that you get unreported money somewhere else. | |
| Feb 20, 2019 at 17:10 | history | edited | mkennedy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typos, grammar, formatting, removed some extra information
|
| S Feb 20, 2019 at 15:44 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited grammar, sentence structure, and spelling
|
| S Feb 20, 2019 at 15:44 | history | suggested | Uciebila | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited grammar, sentence structure, and spelling
|
| Feb 20, 2019 at 15:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 20, 2019 at 15:44 | |||||
| Feb 19, 2019 at 23:48 | comment | added | Traveller | This may seem like an obvious question, but was his passport stamped when he was deported? Also (and others with greater knowledge may comment on this), his travel record may show up when he submits his pre-flight Advance Passenger Information | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 23:45 | answer | added | Augustine of Hippo | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 23:13 | comment | added | Augustine of Hippo | The long write up is unnecessary. Personally I wouldn’t apply for a visa if I were in his shoes. Just show up at the airport. The probability he would be asked a question about being deported from USA is low without him volunteering it. UK and USA increasingly share immigration information so IF asked he shouldn’t lie. He should have good personal impact and articulation skills to convince the immigration officer if/when it comes up. travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126790/… | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 23:05 | history | edited | Traveller |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 19, 2019 at 23:01 | comment | added | Traveller | “...he does not need a visa to visit the UK and get a leave to remain.” I would avoid using the term ‘leave to remain’ in any conversation with UK Immigration officials, it could be misinterpreted as it’s more commonly used in connection with settlement. Better to say ‘leave to enter’ or ‘entry clearance’. | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 22:53 | history | asked | georgechaders | CC BY-SA 4.0 |