Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 1, 2019 at 8:58 comment added Kyralessa @choster [citation needed]
Jul 1, 2019 at 7:48 answer added Andrew Valls timeline score: -6
Sep 24, 2018 at 8:24 comment added Chris H - UK @NateEldredge a big problem with the idea of "banning specific models" was that the ones that caught fire were almost-unbranded models turned out by factories that didn't know what they were doing. The ban would never keep up with the plethora of such brands popping up to exploit a fad.
S Sep 23, 2018 at 23:45 history suggested user1803551 CC BY-SA 4.0
The sarcasm is not relevant and makes the question confusing
Sep 23, 2018 at 17:05 comment added choster As a reminder, Stack Exchange questions are expected to demonstrate some attempt at initial research, no matter how elementary.
Sep 23, 2018 at 15:49 review Suggested edits
S Sep 23, 2018 at 23:45
Sep 22, 2018 at 21:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackTravel/status/1043606068180529153
Sep 22, 2018 at 18:23 comment added Weather Vane @DavidRicherby yes, if they started that it would have to extend to guns that can't fire, oxygen cylinders that are safe, water based paints, spent fireworks, etc. I have certain policies in my business, and sometimes clients try to argue against them, so I politely say: that is my policy.
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:38 comment added David Richerby @NateEldredge Banning specific models would be a nightmare. They'd need to inspect things, need some system for certifying models as safe, run the risk of people putting the stickers of a safe brand on an unsafe hoverboard, ...
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:35 answer added David Richerby timeline score: 29
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:28 vote accept leftaroundabout
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:15 comment added Nate Eldredge @DavidRicherby: Sure. But my point is that they didn't think about whether to only ban specific problematic models, nor whether other less-publicized devices might have the same problem. It was just a matter of "there have been high-profile incidents of some hoverboards catching fire, so we will ban all hoverboards".
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:10 comment added David Richerby @NateEldredge Not sure it's really a knee-jerk. As you say, a lot of them caught fire, and that kind of fire on a plane is a serious danger to hundreds of lives.
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:03 answer added lambshaanxy timeline score: 78
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:02 comment added Nate Eldredge Also, there was a particularly notorious epidemic of early-model hoverboards catching fire, which led to knee-jerk regulations targeting hoverboards specifically.
Sep 22, 2018 at 17:01 comment added Nate Eldredge Hoverboards tend to need especially high-capacity batteries, and they have to be designed to allow high current to flow, since the motor needs a lot of power. So they're more susceptible to catch fire than something like a laptop or phone, and there's a lot more lithium battery to burn if they do.
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:52 history edited leftaroundabout CC BY-SA 4.0
I'm not sure if people think I _actually_ want to bring a hoverboard.
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:48 comment added Weather Vane As you won't be able to talk them out of it, you could explore hoverboard rentals. Make sure it's not a cheap one . . . they still catch fire.
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:46 comment added leftaroundabout @Aganju well there are plenty of appliances with lithium batteries. Something as outlandish as a hoverboard seems an odd representative for them...
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:44 comment added TonyK They have a tendency to spontaneously combust, a bad thing on an aircraft.
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:43 comment added Aganju google 'lithium battery fire'. it's not a joke, and all airlines have that rule now.
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:35 review First posts
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:36
Sep 22, 2018 at 16:33 history asked leftaroundabout CC BY-SA 4.0