Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 27, 2018 at 16:18 history tweeted twitter.com/StackTravel/status/968520811865833472
Feb 27, 2018 at 11:32 comment added WGroleau It's not quite as direct as I thought, but if it exists, it's better than what Google says is the best. And no, I'm not sure. But I think if the map were showing freight routes, it would show a lot more than it did.
Feb 27, 2018 at 4:17 comment added Jim MacKenzie Are you sure it's a passenger line and not a freight line?
Feb 27, 2018 at 2:14 answer added user67108 timeline score: 2
Feb 26, 2018 at 16:47 comment added choster When I search the Korail schedule it doesn't say the route is not possible, it says I need to call to make a reservation. Perhaps two or three transfers and a mix of high-speed and conventional service (as a look at the rail lines map suggests is required) makes it too complex an itinerary, or too long, to be booked via the website.
Feb 26, 2018 at 16:31 comment added WGroleau oops, I just looked at the approximate location and not the name. So it goes near to Jeonju (daejon—대존) And I didn't say it showed a direct route, but it does show a route much closer to a straight line than the one Google offered. But (probably) three transfers where Google only showed two. But Korail won't show any route. at all.
Feb 26, 2018 at 15:34 comment added WGroleau I would have to go find it again. I re-used the browser tab.
Feb 26, 2018 at 15:32 comment added Peter M What map are you looking at? Everything I just googled shows maps with no direct connection
Feb 26, 2018 at 15:23 history asked WGroleau CC BY-SA 3.0