Timeline for UK visa refused under 3.6 a of Appendix V (deception)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2017 at 10:34 | comment | added | user58558 | @Dennis unless the applicant can prove in a judicial review or in a fresh application that the false statement was an innocent mistake, the fresh application is going nowhere. If a civil standard of proof is going to be used then it's game over for him. | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 10:17 | comment | added | user38879 | It really seems that there is nothing to appeal in this application in any case. Everyone is agreed that the application includes a false statement. The offered explanation is that the applicant did not read the questions closely, but that admission by itself would suggest that this application can go no where. Surely the minimum requirement for there to be any issue to resolve is to submit a new application where the applicant does read the questions carefully and answer them accurately. If that one is refused there might be something to complain about, but not now. | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 8:22 | history | edited | user58558 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
| Aug 31, 2017 at 21:07 | history | answered | user58558 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |