5

2 months ago, I was refused entry at the UK border due not meeting the General Visitor requirements Section 4.2. I was told I was not banned from re-entry to UK and my refusal letter makes no mention of a re-entry ban. The refusal letter summarises that I am being refused entry because:

I am not satisfied you are a genuine visitor as required by paragraph 4.2

It also states:

You have not sought entry under any other provisions under the immigration rule

There is no mention of a re-entry ban in the letter.

I have now applied for the New Zealand Working Holiday Visa. I was asked to explain my refusal in the UK which I did by describing what happened and sending a scan of my refusal letter as well as my passport.

They replied asking:

Please advise if you have been prohibited from re-entering the UK. We would appreciate if you could provide any supporting document confirming that you have not been banned from entering the UK again within 04 August 2017.

I have already supplied them with the complete refusal letter.

Is there another way I can explain or show that I am not barred re-entry to the UK?

closed as off-topic by JonathanReez Aug 3 '17 at 19:44

  • This question does not appear to be about traveling within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    From what I understand, if you were "removed" from the UK, you will never be able to visit New Zealand. Good luck. – greatone Aug 3 '17 at 17:59
  • 2
    Wouldn't NZ know the answer already under Five Eyes? – Andrew Lazarus Aug 3 '17 at 18:33
  • @greatone: even after a later successful entry into the UK? – Max Sep 11 '17 at 16:57
  • @Max You would have had to lie to the NZ immigration authorities to have been let in. – greatone Sep 11 '17 at 19:25