Are there any areas that should be avoided and are there any steps I should take to protect myself from radiation?

  • 2
    This is a very common question that I see posted on other travel websites, so I figured I would put it up here. I know the answer but I'm not an expert, I hope someone with a good knowledge of the situation can give a full answer.
    – victoriah
    Commented Jun 21, 2011 at 21:54

5 Answers 5


An american software engineer living in Japan gives a good overview of how big Japan is and why you shouldn't be afraid to travel there after the nuclear accident.

Essentially, the summary is that Japan is very large. It's unlikely that your travel plans as a tourist will be anywhere near the accident.

Source: http://mapfrappe.com/index.html?show=3057enter image description here


I am living here in Tokyo and nobody worries much. Don't worry if your plane lands in Tokyo.

I don't have a Geiger counter but hearing from the local news, Tokyo seems quite safe.

Other places more in the south (Mt Fuji, Osaka, Kyoto, Nara, Nagoya, Okinawa) should be even safer.

You might just want to avoid the Fukushima area, even though going there for a day or two should be OK.

If you're worried, don't drink tap water, and avoid lettuce/leaves (actually those advices were valid 2 months ago but it might be overkill now).

  • 4
    I'm in Nagoya, but the information I've been seeing on the local news and from my contacts up in tokyo jive with what Nicolas said. You should be perfectly fine to travel anywhere in Japan except Fukushima. CNN and BBC have been fear-mongering the whole business about the radiation. So I'd actually NOT trust the news you are getting from those outlets as it is heavily biased. Commented Jun 22, 2011 at 2:02

Yes, of course there are areas you should avoid. However, most of Japan is completely harmless.

Here are two maps of the Japanese radiation, with frequently updated readings, both have the same data sources, mostly governmental:

If you do not trust the government, you can also check out this map, which is assembled by citizen measurements.

If you convert the nSv/h with a converter and check the famous XKCD Radiation Chart, you can see that the generally below 100 nSv/h values all over Japan are equivalent to eating a banana per hour. The higher value around Fukushima below 1000 nSv/h are equivalent to an Arm Xray or 2.4 times what you get normally during a day in average.

So you are not advised spending a longer time in the direct vicinity of the nuclear power plant. The rest of Japan, as background radiation is concerned, is no issue at all.

Regarding food, it basically comes down to the same issue, with the added danger of course that the food travels around the whole country. If you want to be absolutely sure, I would recommend you to buy one of the new very small Geiger counters that you can get for about 40USD which will be shipped to your Hotel in Japan without problems (and without knowing Japanese). However, one has to say that people in Japan are very concerned about radiated food. So you can safely assume that a large part of what reaches the supply chain or reasonably priced has been checked for radiation already. But of course, as history shows anywhere with food safety, this is not a 100% guarantee.


I just got back from Japan this morning and I went to both the Tsunami area where I volunteered for cleanup which I recommend to everybody, and on the way from there to Tokyo I passed through part of Fukushima though not close to the nuclear plant. Everything seemed like business as usual except there are fewer tourists in many parts of the country and in Tokyo my hostel was unbelievably cheap.

  • 1
    Did you have any problems to get to Japan? I've heard from my cousin (some months ago) people at the airport were unwilling to let non-japanese people travel there.
    – rshimoda
    Commented Jun 28, 2011 at 22:22
  • 5
    Which airport had Japanese people unwilling to let non-Japanese people get to Japan?? In any case I took the ferry from Korean and hitchhiked north from Shimonoseki is part of my extreme low budget adventure. Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 6:52

Travelling to any areas in the south west such as Kyoto, Hiroshima, Osaka, Okinawa, etc. are still okay as of this date. However, I'd stay away from the Tokyo area and anywhere more north of that (such as Fukushima). The levels I hear (from family members in Tokyo) aren't too bad if you are only there for a few days, but if you are living there, then the levels may not be healthy.

  • 2
    This is the first time I hear this kind of information. Neither my personal experience, nor my coworkers nor my family members or friends, official or unofficial data (see my post above) seem to underline that Tokyo has elevated levels. Do you have any data to back that up?
    – uncovery
    Commented Mar 18, 2013 at 5:25
  • sorry, overlooked that your reply is from June 2011.
    – uncovery
    Commented Mar 18, 2013 at 7:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .