Most independent travelers are down on cruises, placing them somewhere between package tours and a Turkish prison on the list of ways they would spend their vacation. "Treated like cattle", "only see the cruise ports", "rip-offs": all quite common. That people would only take a cruise because they are lazy, not because it is a good choice.

This inspires the question: Are there any places in the world where cruises are definitely a viable choice to see the sites involved?

  • As is stands, this is quite a subjective and vague question.
    – user766
    Commented Mar 8, 2012 at 21:15

4 Answers 4


One of the most obvious is the Norwegian fjords sightseeing cruise.

  • Those are pretty expensive, but worth every penny (if the weather happens to be fine, though -- Trondheim and Bergen are pretty rainy all year round). Commented Mar 8, 2012 at 15:27

Cruising from Stockholm to Turku is a cheap way to see the nice archipelagoes of both cities while also making some distance. Especially the barren outer parts is hard to reach without your own boat. This photo (by jje over at flickr) may give you an idea of the sight (if good weather....).

archipelago shot from a cruising ship

  • 2
    Typically it's the cheapest way to travel between Sweden & Finland, and compared to a flight there's a lot to see, so these cruises are a very viable option indeed for independent travellers. For details on Stockholm-Turku (10-11 hrs) and Stockholm-Helsinki (15-16 hrs) ferries, see Viking Line and Silja Line websites.
    – Jonik
    Commented Mar 14, 2012 at 5:34

It really depends on the kind of traveler that you are...if you prefer sea or land adventures, or fixed costs up front, rather than variable, or prefixed cuisine/activities, as opposed to adventure... That said a cruise from the Pacific Northwest (Seattle/Vancouver) to Alaska would top my cruise destination list. Depending on the season, witnessing the glaciers from the high seas is very different than glimpsing them from solid land.


Really depends on your definition of "cruise". Here are two things that I have done, that you may be interested in:

  1. Alaska State Ferry System from Bellingham, WA to the Southeast AK. This is a 3 day ferry ride along the Inside Passage, a beautiful place. Plentiful whale and porpoise sightings, you are navigating through islands are usually within sight distance of land (== not boring). It is possible to bring your car on board to contiue the trip further in Alaska, or not (ferry connections to elsewhere in SE are available from destination ports). The best part is, you can reserve a cabin (making this more cruise-like), or you are allowed - encouraged, actually - to either set up a tent in the rear of the ship and duct tape it down to the floor, or grab a lawn chair in solarium and throw your sleeping pad and sleeping bag on. The ferry itself is large and has plentiful inside space for hanging out, watching life out the windows, etc. There is a cafe or you can bring your own food and use the microwaves and hot water. As you can imagine, these ferry trips attract an audience of young, adventure-minded and/or cash-strapped people. Everyone is respectful and chill, and there is ZERO glitz associated with cruise ships per-se.
  2. In many places (Vietnam's Ha Long Bay, Aegean sea, Mediterranean sea), there are plenty of small-ish ships that take people on for a few days of sail for a very reasonable price. Kayaking, scuba diving and sightseeing is usually included; in warmer climates people are encouraged to sleep on the deck. I did a cruise in the Ha Long bay a couple of years ago. My personal opinion was a bit of "meh", but mainly because the ship had a total of 15 people - 14 couples and myself. Being the third wheel in seven different conversations got old really easily. But the experience was definitely more "adventure" and less "cruise".

Hope this helps!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .