I'm eyeying up a flight booking.

First from Auckland (AKL) to Sydney (SYD) with LAN Chile.

Then 3 hours later, from Sydney to Vancouver (YVR) with Air Canada.

However, LAN has a poor rating for timeliness on that route.

I'm making this booking as a single booking through Orbitz.com. If the LAN one is late arriving, am I held accountable for missing the 2nd flight? And as a backup, if I have travel insurance, would that cover the missed flight if the airline didn't?

2 Answers 2


What matters here is your last statement - the fact you're booking it as a single ticket.

When you book a single ticket - regardless of how many airlines you are flying - your ticket is issued by a single airline. In this case that would probably be LAN Chile (as they are the first airline you fly), although it's also possible that it would be Air Canada (as they are the longest flight). For simplicity, lets presume that it's LAN Chile.

When you book your ticket, LAN Chile is basically committing to get you from Auckland to Vancouver, as per the rules in their "Conditions Of Carriage" (CoC) which is basically the terms and conditions that go along with your booking. In short, as long as you don't do anything to break the terms (eg, failing to turn up for your flight), then they have to get you from your starting point to your destination - regardless of issues like delayed flights on ANY carrier.

In your case, that means that if your flight out of Auckland is delayed/cancelled/etc, LAN Chile has to make good on getting you to YVR. That might mean anything from re-routing you (eg, putting you on a AC flight AKL-SFO-YVR), putting you on a different airline (eg, SYD-YVR on United via LAX), or simply putting you onto the AC flight the next day. Obviously exactly what they would do would depend upon availability, how delayed you were, etc.

In the event that you end up having to overnight, some airlines will put you up in a hotel, whilst others will not. Some will do so if the delay is their fault (broken plane), but not if it's outside of their control (bad weather). This is where travel insurance can come in, as most policies would cover the cost of your hotel if you're delayed.

If you were booking these two flights as different tickets then it's a very different story. LAN Chile has to get you to SYD, but if they get you there too late to make your next flight then that's just "too bad". Air Canada would then claim (correctly) that you broke the terms of the CoC on their ticket by not arriving at the airport in time, and thus would normally cancel your ticket. Depending on the airline, they may choose to show you charity and accommodate you on a later flight (eg, next day), but they have no responsibility to do so, and if the next days flight is full, you're pretty much out of luck! In this case most (but not all!) travel insurance policies would cover you, although some may only cover you to the price you originally paid for the missed flight, even though the last-minute replacement flight could cost significantly more - so read the fine print on the policy!

Sydney is a relatively easy airport to transit, and although the lines to re-clear security can be a little long when the LAN Chile flight is due to land, they will normally have cleared out an hour or so later - ie, by the time you'd be coming through if that flight was delayed it would be fast, and you could probably go gate-to-gate in no more than 10-15 minutes. 3 hours gives you at least 2 hours worth of buffer, so unless you expect the LAN Chile flight to be more than 2 hours late you're good to go!

  • Precisely. I'd upvote this twice if I could! Commented Mar 2, 2012 at 10:08
  • Note that if an airline sells you a single ticket with a connection, they allow for what they believe based on their data is sufficient transfer time. It is not in their interest to sell you a ticket that will cost them time and money to rebook a missed connection.
    – Jonas
    Commented Mar 16, 2017 at 8:48

Rules and behaviors on what the airlines will do in this case vary from country to country and could vary from airline to airline. In the US and Europe the airline will put you on the next available flight. Whether or not they will provide you with a place to stay vary by airline and the price of your ticket.

There have been situations when the number of passengers on the outbound flight coming from the connecting flight was significant enough the airline actually delayed the outbound flight until the passengers could make the connection.

Now as far as the travel insurance is concerned you have to check your policy. Most will provide reimbursement if you have to repurchase the ticket but won't give you money for missed flight otherwise.


Specific Air Canada policy with regards missed flights and connections.

You can of course find horror stories about Air Canada too

  • yes, they vary, which is why I specified LAN Chile and Air Canada. So the question is really what happens with them for flights connecting in Sydney...
    – Mark Mayo
    Commented Mar 1, 2012 at 22:05
  • I think that LAN's policies are more relevant here. If the LAN flight is delayed, they are the ones who will have to work out something with Air Canada and possibly cover accomodation in SYD. Commented Mar 2, 2012 at 0:33
  • 1
    If it's within one airline, then as long as it's an IATA airline then the rules don't vary much (if at all) - they have to get you to your destination
    – Jon Story
    Commented Nov 24, 2014 at 15:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .