In September 2015, some countries of the Schengen area decided to put border controls back in place. It might not last, it might happen again in the future, but I am curious about the changes this situation causes, beside probable delays, for travellers that are allowed to enter these countries.

  • 3
    regarding the "rapidly changing event", it might happen in the future, it is as far as I know a possibility countries have. I doubt that this will become irrelevant.
    – Vince
    Commented Sep 16, 2015 at 19:52
  • 1
    And regarding the broadness, given that the 2 answers clearly answer there is almost no change, it does not seem unanswerably broad. But if I can make it any less broad, feel free to comment and explain your opinion.
    – Vince
    Commented Sep 16, 2015 at 19:55

3 Answers 3


The Schengen rules cover several separate aspects:

  • An unified visa policy: All Schengen members are supposed to apply the same standards, use the same database, etc.
  • An unified travel area: Any Schengen visa allows entry into any Schengen state, and travel between those states. (This is a generalization. The visa must be requested from the main destination of the trip.)
  • A lack of border controls: People traveling between Schengen states are generally not inconvenienced by immigration controls. Random checks are still possible, but they are supposed to be the exception.

You can reinstate border controls while retaining the unified travel area and visa policy. For a legal traveler, that means the probability of being checked goes from somewhere near 0% to somewhere closer to 100%. But even under the old rules, the traveler would have been required to show travel papers on demand. For the individual, there is no difference and probably no actionable complaint under EU rules.

(Keep in mind that there are other travel disruptions related to this. Train service has been canceled because of walking refugees on the tracks and chaotic situations in train stations. And if there are riot police blocking hundreds of people who want to go through without either showing papers or being registered at that point as a refugee, then a scruffy-looking backpacker with proper papers is probably out of luck.)

  • 3
    @WoJ, I'm old enough to remember the time before Schengen. In the early 70s, a family car would drive to the border checkpoint, stop, and hand the passports to the officials. A few years later, the car would slow down to walking speed and look if the customs officers signalled us to stop. By the mid 80s, we were bicycling through Europe and many crossings were completely open, with no customs people outside their office. They were amused/irritated when we wanted our passports stamped as a souvenir.
    – o.m.
    Commented Sep 17, 2015 at 9:33
  • 2
    @o.m.: same here :)
    – WoJ
    Commented Sep 17, 2015 at 9:34

Nothing much. Probable delay (and also general unpleasantness, especially if those checks involve some implicit “profiling”) is the main consequence for those who do have a visa or a right to travel in the Schengen area without visa. Also, what happened recently is that some countries decided to scale up and/or openly communicate their intent to reintroduce controls outside of any proper procedure. But internal border checks have been going on for some time, unofficially, and also occasionally been reinstated, completely officially, for special events.

All this probably violates several rules but that's something for the EU Commission to act upon. The Schengen agreement, implementation convention and regulations do not create any actionable right that would help travellers in a practical way if they face a control. Schengen rules also never officially included any provision allowing people to cross borders without ID, simply because carrying ID everywhere is mandatory in some Schengen states anyway.

Incidentally, this shows that the lift on internal border checks is only the tip of the Schengen iceberg and, perhaps surprisingly, the “softest” part of the system. If the EU and all member states continue to deliberately ignore it, the current situation could really go on for a long time without creating that much disruption. It would be much more difficult to ignore a member state which would stop honoring visas from other member states or issue many Schengen visas without following the rules (IIRC Italy briefly threatened to do the latter to force other member states to let asylum seekers go through their borders but never went through with it).

  • 10
    As far as I understand the rules for 'border check free' traveling have always had the option to temporary reinstate checks for special reasons. Checks have been there for football championships as well as in times of political upheaval in some or many of the countries involved.
    – Willeke
    Commented Sep 16, 2015 at 17:59
  • 3
    @Willeke Yes and no, there is a whole chapter in the Schengen Borders code about that… but it's not what's happening now. There are strict conditions and a predefined procedure to reintroduce border checks, neither of which have been followed here AFAIK. Similarly, “bouncing” potential asylum seekers who travel within the area without proper title was never envisioned by the regulations. There is also a specific procedure to follow (that's called the Dublin system because the first agreement about it was signed in Dublin) but that procedure is basically ignored by everybody at the moment.
    – Relaxed
    Commented Sep 16, 2015 at 20:39

I passed through Amsterdam Airport several times during the period that the Netherlands suspended its Schengen commitments in March 2014. At the time I used Amsterdam as my principal hub because KLM was the only major carrier serving my local airport. The Schengen commitments were suspended because of the Nuclear Security Summit being held at the Hague.

http://nos.nl/artikel/616805-grenscontroles-terug-tijdens-top.html (Dutch)

The suspension made no difference to me at all, except once, when I was coming off a flight from Geneva: we all had our passports or ID cards examined on the jet bridge by Dutch police as we deplaned. It was as I remember a reasonably thorough inspection, but executed with a lot of efficiency.

It was mentioned on FlyerTalk: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/klm-flying-dutchman/1558992-border-controls-all-arriving-passengers-march-14-28-a.html

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .