I'm planning a trip and I see the term "tourist tax" littered about. My question is why do countries/cities tax tourists when tourism in itself is of economical benefit to the country?
It makes sense to look for money where it is, most taxes are that way, where is the contradiction?– RelaxedApr 16, 2015 at 18:18
Similar: Why is public transport from/to the airport so expensive?– chosterApr 16, 2015 at 18:27
Because they can.
Not all tourists spend money in the cities and most cities do not get direct benefits from tourist money while they do spend money on public transport, roads and other things tourists use.
In most places I have been tourist tax was a very small amount, about 1% or less of the cost of being a tourist in the town.
2(+1) Also note that even when tourists do spend money and a part of that money is collected as taxes (e.g. VAT, corporate tax, taxes on petrol products, etc.), those taxes might go to the central state or various other levels of government and not to the municipality.– RelaxedApr 16, 2015 at 18:17
2Also, tourists don't vote. It's a case of sticking it to the other guy. Apr 17, 2015 at 1:41
In California, the tax is usually imposed on hotel rooms, and catches many business travelers on expense account. The revenue can then fund tourist information centers and Visit-us campaigns.