The Visa Restrictions Index says that people with a passport from the UK, Finland and Sweden can travel freely to 173 countries. People from Belgium, Italy and The Netherlands can travel to 171.

I am interested to learn which countries make up that difference, but I can't find any additional informational about the data this list is based on. Which countries can someone from Sweden travel freely to that I (as a Dutchman) can't?

Best countries to have a passport from

  1. UK, Finland, Sweden (number of visa-free countries 173)

  2. Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, USA (172)

  3. Belgium, Italy, Netherlands (171)


So basically it's not just two countries that make up the difference. For example, as as Dutch citizen you can get a visa-on-arrival in Mozambique, while Sweden can't. Sweden has visa free entry into Vietnam, while Dutch don't.

Rather than list all the differences, I'll point to these two Wiki pages:

Visa requirements for Swedish citizens

Visa Requirements for Dutch Citizens

They list all the countries and the rules for the citizens - visa free, visa-on-arrival, and so on. It also means it'll continue to be more up to date as the rules change (eg this past year Kazakhstan granted a year of visa-free entry to British citizens - go figure!)

  • And if you open the color-coded world maps in the two Wikipedia articles in different tabs, you can do a blink comparison between them! – Henning Makholm Jan 31 '15 at 15:09
  • @HenningMakholm, yeah but interestingly enough, from this blink comparison it would seem that the Dutch passport gives free access to two more countries, instead of the other way around: Kazakhstan and Mozambique. – wvdz Jan 31 '15 at 15:20
  • If you use an online-diff tool, e.g. changedetection.com/comparepages.html and compare the Swedish and Dutch lists - you will see plenty of differences. – Grzegorz Oledzki Jan 31 '15 at 19:46
  • @Grzegorz: Most of those differences will be irrelevant, though -- such as different sources cited or different phrasings. – Henning Makholm Feb 1 '15 at 2:38
  • @HenningMakholm - that's why I would look into yellow color (marking changes) in the "visa requirement" column. Skip the comments. I thought it might help someone. No worries. – Grzegorz Oledzki Feb 1 '15 at 11:39

The link in the question is actually the index from 2013. The numbers for 2014 are respectively 174 and 172, which is confirmed by the wikipedia pages linked by Mark Mayo: Swedish passport, Dutch passport.

However, the answer to my question seems to be: it's not true that a Dutch passport gives less access to countries than a Swedish passport. Inspecting the tables in the same wikipedia pages learns that:

The Netherlands have free travel rights to Mozambique and Kazakhstan over Sweden, and Sweden has free travel right to Vietnam and Rwanda over the Netherlands.

So they actually tie in number of countries. The index however, is about "countries and territories". So the difference must lie in different access to certain territories.

  • There are further differences than the four you mention here. I don't care to check every country, but Swedes are e.g. allowed to travel to Turkey without a visa, while Dutch citizens require a visa for travel to Turkey. – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo Jan 31 '15 at 17:52
  • 2
    eVisa (in this context) just means that you can apply for the visa online instead of visiting a Turkish embassy or consulate. An application for a Turkish eVisa may of course be rejected, just as any other visa application. – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo Jan 31 '15 at 21:53
  • 1
    Well, of course it can be rejected, but so can a visa-on-arrival. I meant that I think that this is still counted towards the count of 172. – wvdz Jan 31 '15 at 23:35
  • 1
    @Tor-EinarJarnbjo And so can entry when you already have a visa or don't need one at all. But the Turkish e-visa was rolled out as an alternative to the visa-on-arrival, not as a new way to apply for a regular Turkish visa. You just need to provide basic info and pay a small fee, no need to send your passport or any supporting documentation. It seems closer to an ESTA than a traditional visa so it makes sense to include it in this context. – Relaxed Feb 2 '15 at 17:11
  • 1
    @Relaxed: And because of that (you can be denied entry to a country even if you don't need a visa), these counts are not very useful for any purpose at all. The Henley Index lists however the "Number of countries and territories which can be entered without a visa by a citizen of the respective country", so it does not make sense to include countries, for which you either need a visa-on-arrival or a pre-arranged electronic visa. – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo Feb 2 '15 at 22:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.