I've found some maps that shows the overland route that was used to trade between Europe and Asia, but I haven't found a map accurate enough to plan a trip following the ancient route.

Also, I believe this route is still practicable. For instance, the Wikipedia states:

In recent years, both the maritime and overland Silk Routes are again being used, often closely following the ancient routes

but has no link to the source or to a detailed map.

The question is: Is there any accurate map or description that allows one to draw up a plan to make a trip following the Silk Route?

  • The silk road project got some nice maps. They are a bit small but helps to get the general idea.
    – froderik
    Commented Dec 12, 2011 at 20:57
  • Take the Transcontinental Railroad. You can still ship freight from Omaha to Sacramento. Remember Union Pacific? They own it all, and it's wall to wall container trains today. But there have been many rerailings and realignments - smoothing curves, daylighting tunnels, cutoffs like straight across the Salt Lake instead of via Promontory, all normal upkeep for a continuously active line... point is, Is it still the Transcontinental Railroad? Is that standard acceptable to you, could we we give you a list of highways (many of them freeways/motorways)? Commented Dec 17, 2018 at 22:53

3 Answers 3


This past summer I followed quite a bit of it through Central Asia, in areas which I'd consider to be moderately difficult to navigate - like Uzbekistan.

Wikitravel shows more information on the Silk Road, and it's worth noting there are several branches of it, depending on whether you go through the deserts, or through Afghanistan. Individual links on that page, will give you details about how to reach each city.

For me, Uzbekistan is a hidden jewel - most people can't even name it as a country, and yet Khiva, Bukhara and Samarkand are among some of the most impressive historic cities I've ever seen.

The Registan in Samarkand at sunset

And yes, sadly it's not as accurate as you'd like, but I saw this map just inside Khiva's West Gate:

enter image description here

The problem with what you're trying to find is that there is no ONE Silk Road. Even when travelling between two cities, people might detour when a river is in flood, or to feed animals, or to avoid a known criminal hotspot. So there are in some ways thousands of potential deviations - only the rough directional heading between cities will be shown on most maps. Indeed, according to Wikipedia, there were even maritime routes!

You may also consider this more detailed list of cities commonly accepted as being along the various Silk road routes. Map included on page.

  • The maritime 'silk' route mentioned on the Wikipedia page is highly contentious. There were some (read: a handful, at most, and not first hand) contacts between Rome and China, during Roman times, but there was certainly no established trade going on between the two.
    – MastaBaba
    Commented Jun 20, 2012 at 21:25
  • Further, part of the raison d'etre for the silk route's existence was the inability to trade by sea, due to all sorts of maritime conflicts.
    – MastaBaba
    Commented Jun 20, 2012 at 21:27
  • If it's contentious, you probably shouldn't use the word "certainly" ;) Regardless, as the article points out - the main "land routes were supplemented by sea routes, which extended from the Red Sea to coastal India, China and Southeast Asia."
    – Mark Mayo
    Commented Jun 20, 2012 at 21:41
  • :) There was no direct trade between these opposites ends of this maritime route, but there was at least some trade on at least most of the sections of the route, at least some of the time.
    – MastaBaba
    Commented Jun 21, 2012 at 8:28
  • Great answer (+1)! Any chance, that you can post a link to second image (map) in a bigger dimensions, so we can read the entire pictured road in more details?
    – trejder
    Commented Sep 8, 2015 at 10:39

Jim Rogers, the so-called Investment Biker (and author of the book of the same name), seemed to think that the Silk Road was navigable.

He didn't seem sure as to exactly where it was, but took his (former) girlfriend over (a known) part of it on a motorcycle, then they headed north to harsher points north and east in Siberia. My guess is that if someone provided him with a good map, he (or somewhat like him) could follow it.


As Mark Mayo points out, there is no one Silk Road. There were plenty, not even taking into account different routes from city to city.

Moving from east to west, or vice versa, there are plenty of cities that could be visited, though visiting some would make it highly impractical to visit others. For example, some travelers would go north of the Caspian, some would go south. And with different cities and regions providing different specialties, sometimes it would make sense to visit the one, not the other.

So, one could argue that if you travel from south eastern Europe to anywhere between Ulaan Baatar and Hong Kong, overland, you'd be sticking to (some version of) the ancient Silk Road.

Sure, some routes were more popular than others. If you want to stick to the, historically, more beaten path, you'd probably be roughly traveling through, or close to, ...

  • Istanbul (Turkey)
  • Tbilisi (Georgia)
  • Rasht (Iran)
  • Mashhad (Iran)
  • Samarkand (Uzbekistan)
  • Dushanbe (Tajikistan)
  • Hotan (China)
  • Beijing (China)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .