Recently, I was looking to book with one of the traditional "scheduled carriers" who now offer both baggage-inclusive and hand baggage only fares. Looking on the airline's own website, the fare at the time with a single piece of checked luggage was about $10 more than the hand baggage only fare. Searching around, I found a fairly well known OTA (Online Travel Agent) offering the same flight for slightly less than the airline's hand baggage only rate, but with one piece of checked luggage. Figuring that OTA had a special offer on, I took some screenshots, and booked with them.

A little bit after booking, I then went to the airline's website to pick my seats. In the Manage My Booking process, it was happy to let me pick a seat, happy to accept my frequent flier details, but... insisted that I was booked into a hand baggage only fare, with no checked baggage allowance, and would need to pay about $40 online to add a bag, or more at the airport!

Since then, I've contacted both. The airline say it's nothing to do with them, and I have to speak to my travel agent. The OTA say that I have to speak to the airline about baggage, it's nothing to do with them, and point me to a help section on their website which claims that the airline in question always offers at least a single bag of up to 23kg, which isn't actually the case based on the airline's own booking site! The OTA seems mostly to respond in cut'n'paste standard answers, so haven't yet replied specifically about my screenshot, not specifically about their website disagreeing with the airline.

This leaves me rather stuck. The airline says I booked hand baggage only, and any disputes over that are with my travel agent. The OTA claim (via their help section) that I must by default have one bag, and otherwise tells me to ask my airline about baggage. I don't want to wait to get to the airport to be hit with a large fee, but equally I don't want to pay online for a piece of luggage that I thought I'd already paid for.

In this situation, with both parties pointing at each other, who is it that I need to concentrate my attention at to get the inclusive baggage allowance shown during booking?

Is it the airline's responsibility, or the OTA's?

  • 4
    Which OTA is it?
    – smci
    Commented Dec 3, 2014 at 12:45
  • 3
    In a similar situation, I tricked the airline and agency into a conference call, and once agents from both were on the call, they resolved it
    – Akash
    Commented Mar 25, 2015 at 9:32

5 Answers 5


If you buy a mobile phone, and the store tells you it has 2gb RAM, then when you reach home and open the box, you find that it has only 1gb of RAM (and the manual states the same as well), who's to blame now? the manufacturer or the store? of course the store.

The same exact thing happened to you. Regardless of the reason, whether it is plain cheating, misunderstanding or whatever. Your opponent is indeed the travel agency. The airlines responsibility starts when you check in.

What to do

  1. Email them again, this time attach the screenshots, the ones you had when you made the reservation and a screenshot from the airline's website where it says "only hand bag", make them understand.
  2. Call them, talk to a human, these things are better explained with voice calls because they can't skip lines as they do when they read emails, so no cut&pate replies without understanding that it is their mistake.
  3. If nothing from the above works, go public! and that is twitter, attach some screenshots and hopefully this will solve it, reputation issues will make them pay attention.
  • 4
    Depending on the country of purchase of the ticket, various consumer protection laws might apply. Some customer protection laws are specific to online purchase for example.
    – audionuma
    Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 6:50
  • 3
    Agreed with @user13619. In the U.S., what they did would be considered false advertising.
    – reirab
    Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 8:41

It's the Travel Agent's responsibility. Period.

A Travel-Agent that transfer you to the airline to solve your problems is like your lawyer telling you to go convince the judge you're innocent. It's their job.

Let me explain why: Travel Agent are the middle man in this scenario, they work for the airline to get you a seat. Once they do that, they either take commission from the airline or/and take service-fee from you (the passenger). The 'buy' transaction is not where it's all over. They are now working for you because you paid them. They're providing you a service by answering your questions, providing alternatives if things get wrong and so forth. It looks like you have sufficient evidence to support your case -simply email them with the screenshots you have and ask them to followup.


A friend recently had this happen. He'd booked a flight for his family (moving from the UK to Australia) with Emirates, through a travel agency. The flight had a special code with the agency, meaning they could take extra luggage.

At the airport, they were told they were over the limit, the code wasn't on their booking and they'd need to pay an extra 2000 pounds(!). Despite a crying kid, very upset people and it being fairly obvious there'd been a lack of communication between the travel agency and the airline, neither was taking responsibility.

He ended up having to pay, or not get on the flight. It went on for months afterwards before it was shown that while the agency had booked it, either they'd not used the code or the airline hadn't received it. Moral of the story - check with the airline as well as the agency to make sure the allowance will be recognised, because it's up to the airline's gate staff to decide if you're getting on the plane at the end of the day - they won't care who your travel agency is.

If you can't confirm, or there's a discrepancy, get it in writing from your agency that the allowance is what they claim it is. That way they'll be responsible if it's not accurate - after all, they're the ones who sold you the ticket, not the airline. To take it to an extreme example, if the travel agency promised you free pet baby llamas on board, the airline clearly won't be providing that and it'd be the agency / OTA at fault. They're the ones specifying what they're selling, you and the onus is on them to be accurate.

A tip I've found, if you're really getting nowhere, is if the OTA has a twitter account (or perhaps the airline as well) send out a public tweet about it (polite but accurate) about their failings, and it's surprising how quickly you'll often get a response, and they'll try to sort it out. Bad press is something they tend to want to avoid.


Given the details you provide, this answer is not going to be specific for travelling. To me, the crucial part of your case description is this:

The OTA seems mostly to respond in cut'n'paste standard answers, so haven't yet replied specifically about my screenshot, not specifically about their website disagreeing with the airline.

This seems to be the typical procedure of "customer service" with a large number of companies (phone companies, online stores, etc., all alike). It's a tactic of answering with unrelated or nonsensical responses that don't help you with your problem, but are only meant to annoy you, hoping that you'll eventually give up. In my experience, the most effective strategy in such cases is to collect evidence for a reasonable amount of time and then contact where you can realistically expect someone human to get your message:

  • Continue the dialogue with "customer service" for a few mails. If your time till the travel date is sufficient, do try to reach a "ridiculous" level, such as 20 mails, there.
  • Do not overthink what they might be thinking, or what they already know. Such "customer services" tend to keep the complete conversation history of the support item as a fullquote in all mails, yet are usually totally oblivious of what was said before.
  • Write clear and simple questions. For each question not yet answered, ask explicitly why that question was not responded to.
  • When you receive a response that points to something that was already ruled out in a previous mail, explicitly point out that you already told them XYZ is not possible/applicable.
  • Write all of these e-mails in a calm and neutral, possibly friendly, tone. If there are any people on the other side, they should be annoyed by the repetitiveness and (in your case) uselessness of their work, not by your behaviour. (If anything, that might lead to someone actually making an effort to truly help you, at which point you can abort the process described here.)
  • Under no circumstances, call them by phone. No matter how often they insist that you'd get "better service" by phone, that's just another copy-and-paste text of theirs, and it's their attempt to get the conversation off the (yours, at least) record. The result will just be that you have no written transcript of what was discussed, and if things become serious, the company will claim "customer service" told you information XYZ on the phone.
  • If you like, you can also send a paper letter to "customer service", citing your previous conversation, and see what will be reponded then, to obtain some more tangible evidence.

That concludes your contact with so-called "customer service".

  • Once you have collected a notable number of e-mails during your exchange, write a paper letter. Do not send it to customer support, send it directly to management. If such a service is available in your place, send it in a way that receipt has to be acknowledged by the recipient with a signature card that is sent back to you.
  • In that paper letter, write clear, single, questions, both about your issue and about the incompetence of "customer service". Point out explicitly those conversation passages where "customer service" sent back nonsensical instructions, whose preconditions were already ruled out in previous mails.
  • Attach a full transcript of your messages with "customer service".
  • In your text, do not hesitate to emphasize how disappointed you are with the company's performance, and how you cannot recommend it to anyone who asks you for advice any more.
  • Set a firm deadline for the company to react, for example, two or three weeks. Explicitly state that, no matter what, you will consider the option to press criminal charges for fraud (and that's a good place to cite/point to the explicit statement about luggage fees from the company's website again). (Of course, write that in a way that is realistic in your place.)

That should work to solve your immediate issue, and if you're lucky, you might even get a "We're genuinely sorry"-freebie from them.

  • This may work if you have sufficient time before the flight, and if the time it takes to write 20 emails costs below $40. Otherwise, I would recommend a faster track (going public after getting three nonsense answers per email).
    – Alexander
    Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 11:39
  • @Alexander: I'm not sure what good "going public" is supposed to do. Usually, in such cases, I am well able to find reports from other former customers who have "gone public". Apparently, it didn't change anything about the respective companies' behaviour. Why would a company with 1000+ customers care about five disgruntled former customers who were unfortunately affected by unlikely corner cases? The cost of that loss is calculated into the prices. Hence, the only way I see to enforce a reaction from the company is to drastically raise the possible cost, as outlined above. Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 12:18
  • @Alexander: (With that said, I agree that my suggestion requires some time and is therefore most suitable for non-time-critical orders.) Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 12:23
  • 2
    @O.R.Mapper - The threat of "going public" can be effective. My young son was harmed (horrible rash) by a shirt from a very popular clothing outlet. My wife contacted customer service and got no where after several attempts. After finally threatening to post pictures of the evidence online via social media, the company abruptly changed course, offered an immediate refund, reimbursement of his medical care (1 doctors visit and some medicine) and a store credit as well. Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 19:51
  • @EkoostikMartin: I concede that when tangible (or rather, visible) medically relevant traces are present, things may be different from the situation at hand, where merely a relatively (!) minor financial damage/inconvenience was created. Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 21:03

There's the question who is right, and there's the question how you get on your flight with both one piece of checked-in luggage and your hand luggage. The second question might be more important to you, and your only choice may be to pay the airline. If you ask them they will most likely at least send you written documentation that the travel agent booked a flight without checked-in luggage and that they got paid for a flight without checked-in luggage, so when you fight it out with the travel agency you have evidence that it was the travel agency's fault.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .