31

I read that some airlines such as United Airlines ban the use of Knee Defenders during flight. Is there any comprehensive list of airlines that ban the use of Knee Defenders during flight (or conversely a list of airlines that do not ban them)?

  • 13
    I'm curious if users of Knee Defenders recline their own seats. – CGCampbell Aug 27 '14 at 20:51
  • 4
    @CGCampbell I'm sure they have a 'Knee Defendant Honor Code'. – a20 Aug 28 '14 at 9:31
  • 4
    @a20 egocentric jerks have an honour code? Unless it is "I do what I like, others be darned" of course. Most people who go out of their way to control the behaviour of others (including spending good money on things like this) are people who don't give a darn about other people, and will throw their seats back the moment the seatbelt sign goes off and not put them back up until they're told to in person by a flight attendant (and then complain about it). – jwenting Aug 28 '14 at 10:54
  • I'm sure it was tongue-in-cheek... – Mark Mayo Aug 28 '14 at 12:52
  • 1
    The picture with the man with his knees up is a joke and misrepresents. I'm tall and I put my feet under the seat in front of me. Why promote a false image that isn't accurate. put your feet under the seat in front of you dummy! – user19748 Aug 29 '14 at 15:19
23

It would appear not, but there's nothing stopping us from creating one. People can edit the answer as we find more.

Airlines that ban the Knee Defender

Airlines that discourage but don't ban the Knee Defender

Airlines that allow the Knee Defender

Airlines with seats that do not recline

  • 2
    That source about some British airlines supposedly allowing Knee Defender is really dubious... – jpatokal Aug 28 '14 at 12:38
  • @it's really old, but it's a source. If someone has something more up to date, they can update it... – Mark Mayo Aug 28 '14 at 12:54
  • 1
    On two low-fare US Airlines, Spirit and Allegiant, the seats do not recline so Knee Defender is superfluous. – Andrew Lazarus Aug 31 '14 at 0:15
  • I believe Cathay Pacific used to obviate the need for one, mainly due to its fixed-back seats (non-reclining faux-recline), but I don't know what they do now that they've gotten rid of them. Speaking of which, what's Emirates' policy on them? – gparyani Sep 14 '14 at 7:04
  • For reasons given in the other answer, the contents of this one is superfluous. – DJClayworth Jun 3 '15 at 13:08
29

Such a list would not be meaningful. All airlines have wide rules to prohibit "tampering" with seats, with Knee Defenders or otherwise; you can improvise one with a well-sized bottle, after all. Those that point out the Knee Defender as banned are only making it explicit that this specific device is not allowed.

More to the point, if the passenger unable to recline complains, the flight attendants will insist that you stop using it.

  • 14
    Yes, but the point I'm trying to make is that "not banned" does not equal "allowed". – jpatokal Aug 27 '14 at 5:34
  • 15
    No. Everybody has the right to recline and the responsibility to accept getting reclined on. If you don't like this, pay for a bigger seat. See also: travel.stackexchange.com/questions/20171/… – jpatokal Aug 27 '14 at 8:08
  • 6
    I don’t mind getting reclined on, but the person in front is going to have to accept that they’re not going to be able to recline very far as my thighs are long enough that my knees act as their own Knee Defenders in most economy seats. – Robin Whittleton Aug 27 '14 at 11:48
  • 2
    @Robin There is always a nice solution of asking a person in front not to do this. – Karlson Aug 27 '14 at 13:58
  • 4
    @a20 What I mean is that it would be a pointless and empty gesture because nobody likes it when the person in front of them reclines and everybody knows that. The unwritten rule is that if someone wants to recline, they recline. Asking for permission is pointless. Also, I've been flying economy class for about 30 years and I've never had someone ask me for permission to recline their seat, so I'm not sure what you mean about there being less thoughtfulness and courtesy "nowadays". Sounds to me like misplaced nostalgia for the "good old days". – JLRishe Aug 28 '14 at 9:25

protected by Community Sep 3 '14 at 6:25

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.