Why is it much cheaper to have rental cars returned to the same place as opposed to elsewhere?

Never understood this when booking car rentals.

If I want to rent a car, and rent it from Location A, and return it to Location A, the price is significantly cheaper as opposed to having a car rented from Location A, but returned to Location B.

Why is this? I can't find anything online that would help me understand this? When I am at car rental agencies, sometimes when we are waiting on a car, they explain it is coming from another branch into the branch I am it. Then why is it so important that car rentals go back to the same place for a cheaper price?

  • 1
    Note that in certain regions and times of the year for certain kind of cars (e.g. RVs) it is the other way round, because they want to get the cars back to where they want to have it because quite some people used the (more expensive) one-way option earlier.
    – PlasmaHH
    Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 12:03
  • There are no additionnal fee for one-way car rentals between California, Nevada and Arizona.
    – Francois
    Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 11:52
  • 1
    @FrancoisB. That's not true; I just looked at rentals to pickup and return a car to LAX, and for the same dates, to pick up from LAX and return at SFO. Returning to SFO increases the price of the rental by over 100 dollars. Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 12:22
  • It was using a broker. The car rental company was Alamo. I travelled once from San Francisco to Fresno, and once from Las Vegas to Los Angeles with no "one-way" fee. And it was said to be the same with other car rental companies proposed by the broker.
    – Francois
    Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 12:51
  • 1
    @Francois there's never a "one-way fee". The base rate itself is simply higher, in the same way a hotel doesn't charge a "weekend fee" but may charge a higher rate on weekends. (Or lower, depending on customer patterns, same as with one-way rentals.) Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 22:10

5 Answers 5


There are elements of truth in most of the other answers, but as a 16-year veteran of the rental car industry in the US, I'll toss my take into the mix.

Most of the time when you're searching, the answer is: "because they can."

What I mean by that is that the whole "well, someone has to drive it back to the renting office" is not actually the case. That's because most rental offices in mid-size and larger cities are corporate-owned, and all three of the big-name rental companies that operate the eight major brands (Avis, Budget, Enterprise, Alamo, National, Hertz, Dollar, and Thrifty) now use a "floating fleet" model, which means that the companies maintain a nationwide single fleet and any car can be assigned to and rented from any location at any time.

So if someone rents a car at Avis LAX and returns it at Avis in Austin, the car simply gets washed by the detailing crew at Avis Austin, placed in a parking stall at Avis Austin, and assigned to the next Avis Austin customer who comes in to pick up that size car. The same thing happens if they rent at Avis LAX and return at Avis in downtown Los Angeles or Avis in Midtown Manhattan or Avis at Chicago Midway airport. That's why a large number of license plates on any corporate-owned rental lot tend to be from out of state.

Now, of course, for every person who picks up in LAX and returns elsewhere, there's usually someone renting elsewhere and returning in LAX, so the fleet tends to stay pretty balanced. That's why I say they charge the one-way fee "because they can"--because there really isn't a hard cost to them. Cars go out, cars come in, and all is good. But the market (supply, demand, and competition) allows them to charge a premium price for one-way rentals, so even though there's no (or a very minimal) direct expense associated with these kinds of one-way rentals, they do it because they can.

Of course, sometimes one-way flows do result in an imbalanced fleet. If LAX loses too many cars and they have fewer cars than they forecast needing to meet demand, then they do have to arrange for cars to be brought back from somewhere else. So sometimes it is necessary to truck a load or ten of cars in from elsewhere, and that does have a cost, so collecting one-way fees allows them to cover those costs.

It's worth mentioning that seasonal demand can have some interesting effects. I've taken advantage of the fall "Florida Drive-In" specials, where picking a car up in the Northeast and dropping it off in Florida can net some extremely attractive rates ($5-10 per day or so)--cheaper than a standard round-trip rental! This helps the rental car companies move cars from the colder northern states (where demand slacks off in the winter) to the warmer southern states (where winter is peak season). It's much cheaper to have people drive cars down for you than to pay a car carrier to haul it down by truck or, even worse, to have cars sit idle in the north while offices in the south buy or lease extra cars to meet demand. (There's also the related Florida Drive-Out special that takes place in the spring and some less-lucrative similar offerings out west.) So it's not always true that one-way rentals are more expensive!

As well, there are certain places where one-way fees seem to be very reasonable or even not charged. One answer mentioned rentals in Germany--that's a place where one-way fees seem not to be part of the local rental culture, unless you try to drop the car off outside of Germany. Intra-Florida rentals are often quite cheap (due to a ton of competition--it's the largest rental car market in the world and there are literally dozens of rental car companies that operate at Florida's major airports), and intra-California one-ways are frequently not charged fees, too (that's because the one-way flows between places like Los Angeles and San Francisco are pretty balanced--as many people are interested in driving up Highway 1 as are interested in driving down Highway 1, I suppose), so that, combined with the high volume and competition, lends itself to reasonably-priced one-way rentals.

Now, when it comes to franchised locations, one-way fees are based much more in the realities of rental car logistics. If a car owned by a licensee location (typically found at smaller, more rural airports or in some smaller towns) ends up far away from its base, there are hard costs to deal with that situation. The best option is for the receiving location to rent the car back to its owning location on a paid one-way rental, but there's no guarantee of that happening quickly, and the owning location loses the potential revenue of the car they paid for until it gets back into the fleet. Failing that, the owning location has to pay to have the car transported back home, either by car carrier or by sending an employee to go retrieve the car--not a small cost. And in a worst case situation, the least-bad solution is for the owning location to simply sell the car to the receiving location, but that's obviously not without its own costs and logistical headaches.

In these cases with franchised locations, the one-way fees are actually intended to be punitive and dissuade people from choosing that option, but they also cover the rental agency's costs if someone does require a one-way rental.

I should also address a couple of topics with one-way fees. Most rental car agencies now don't quote an explicit, broken-out one-way drop fee, instead baking the one-way fee into the rate itself. For example, a standard round-trip rental in Portland might run you $40 per day, but if you quote a reservation for a one-way to Seattle, it might balloon up to $100 per day. However, some companies, as well as some booking channels (usually prepaid brokers), still break the fee out (for the hypothetical Portland rental, both the round-trip and one-way rentals would price out at $40 per day, but the one-way would have a $100 drop fee attached).

The former model works best for short rentals, while the latter is more advantageous for longer rentals. In the Portland example, if you can do your one-way drive in a single day, the included one-way is cheaper (a net extra charge of $60). But if you're going to take a week to drive the Washington coastline, the weekly rate would balloon from a couple hundred bucks to north of $500. With a separately-itemized $100 drop fee, you'd pay the same fee even if you kept the car for a month. In any case, the best thing to do is just plug your dates and locations into a search engine that searches all rental companies at once and choose the one that displays the cheapest total price (ignore the base rate and pay attention instead to the total with all taxes and fees).

Mileage fees are sometimes charged, but they're more common with franchises. However, sometimes you'll see them applied at major locations depending on what kind of discount code you use. For example, the USAA discount code with Hertz returns very attractive rates even on long-distance one-ways until you notice the catch: an almost punitive mileage fee that can total hundreds of dollars. Unless you're literally just driving across town, mileage-based one-way fees are rarely the best option.

  • Are rental cars in the US actually owned by the rental companies? Aren't they just leased from some other company? If the latter is the case, they could just sign over the lease, right? If that is the case, it wouldn't have to be the same car that returns to those rural airports, it could just be some other car from some other location and it balances itself out.
    – JJJ
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 7:56
  • 2
    These days, "risk" (i.e. owned) cars are the rule, and "program" (i.e. leased) cars are the exception. Enterprise pioneered the model of using their massive buying power to buy cars at a substantial discount, running them in the fleet for a year or so, and selling them--sometimes at a profit to what they bought them for. The other companies took notice and largely moved wholesale to this model about a decade ago. Even for leased cars, though, it's not a simple matter of "just signing over the lease." It may well be technically feasible, but it isn't something that's done as a matter of course.
    – jackal
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 8:01

So, first off, this isn't always the case. Point to point rentals can be cheaper in some circumstance. Especially if you're taking a car from an area with low demand to a return lot with high demand. You can get some great deals this way seasonally, but they're hard to shop for.

That said, the reason it's generally cheaper to return the car to where you got it is because if you don't, somebody else will generally have to. Point to point rentals are rare, so when they happen, it throws off the very carefully managed inventories of multiple rental lots. Suddenly, one lot is short a car, and another lot has a surplus. In order to rebalance things, they either need to hope somebody wants to reverse your itinerary (unlikely), incentivize somebody to do so and lose money offering them a bargain, or pay an employee to transport the vehicle.


This really depends on the franchise, licensing and ownership in that area.

In Germany, I rented a car in Frankfurt and returned it to Munich, no extra cost (national owner, national registration).

In Calgary, I can rent a car at the airport and return it at any city location, no extra cost (same franchise).

If I rent a car in Calgary and return it to Edmonton, I pay a one-way fee as someone has to drive the car back (different franchise, same registration). They might get lucky and have a one-way renter drive it back.

If I rent a car in Calgary and return it in Toronto, the agent in Calgary simply sells the car to the Toronto location. It's cheaper than returning it. (Different franchise, regional registration. Ontario franchises cannot rent an Alberta-registered vehicle.)

I asked the counter staff why I have two keys on a steel-cable (non-separable) ring, the second key is clearly not a spare. One-way sales happen often enough that they want all the car's hardware to travel with it.

  • 6
    Thanks for answering the question as to why they give you two keys to the car when only one key is needed!
    – RoboKaren
    Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 3:37
  • 1
    Thanks for key explanation also. So the Toronto location loses $20k capital, pays a DMV registration fee, and goes stands in line to get Ontario plates, and they don't charge you for that??? At all? Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 18:08

It spares the agency the expense of driving the car back to the original agent or otherwise managing the inventory - rental car employees spend a lot of time driving cars from one agent to the other and then someone has to drive the employe


There is another factor, often the best deals are from small companies that just have one branch. Clearly these companies don’t offer the option of returning the car elsewhere.

So as to complete with the small companies and still make a nice margin, the large companies “over price” the add-ons that the small companies can not provide.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .