I have heard that if I have been to some countries I might be refused entry to the US. I'm planning to travel (vacation) a bit in the Middle East; that will include Iran, Lebanon, Qatar, Oman and Jordan. At the end of the year I will go to the US.

What I have heard is that even though I might not be refused entry to the US, I might get questioned a lot at the immigration checkpoint. I just want to know how much of this is true. I have a ten-year US visa already as a tourist, and I'm a Thai national.

  • 3
    Some young folks get hassled if they've crossed the US-Mexican land border even once. In that case, it's probably suspicion of drug trade involvement. Commented May 4, 2014 at 14:01
  • 15
    Some of the immigration guys at JFK are completely nuts, I've had a much more pleasant experience at LAX. The very first time I went through immigration at JFK from the UK, back in 1988, I was 18, I said "I beg your pardon?" to some unintellible question, at which point the immigration chap stood up, yelled at his friend at the other end of the hall "this young man here thinks I don't do my job properly! Do I do my job properly Chuck?" "Yes you do Bill!" (or whatever names they had). Some of these people are thoroughly unpleasant.
    – PatrickT
    Commented May 4, 2014 at 14:44
  • 5
    Sometimes you can get a second passport from your government if you travel to 'conflicting' countries. Commented May 4, 2014 at 17:33
  • 4
    Considering that Iran does not refuse entry to US tourists and considering the high number of Iranian students in US universities, I doubt that having been in Iran before is enough to be refused to enter the US.
    – mouviciel
    Commented May 4, 2014 at 19:11
  • 4
    OT: maybe it's just me, but if a country makes so hard to visit it, I'd rather go somewhere else.
    – o0'.
    Commented May 5, 2014 at 14:25

4 Answers 4


There is no list published by the US government as mentioned in other answers, but I know people who were refused US visas in different US embassies/consulates because they have visited one or more of these countries:

  • Iran
  • Syria
  • Pakistan
  • Sudan
  • Bahrain

The list could be longer, and visiting one of these countries doesn't mean you will be refused; but, it matters, because they have a field in the visa application about the countries visited in the past 10 years. The guys I know were asked questions such as "what's the purpose of visiting". The rejection/approval totally depends on the interviewer and/or your answer. I have noticed the younger you are the higher chance of getting refused, if you visited one of these countries. I guess they believe the younger you are the easier your brain to be washed with anti-US stuff. Also I have noticed people who go to the US on regular basis they do not get refused! Usually these people have family ties. The last thing I have noticed is people who are from those other countries might have better chances of getting the visas while people who visited those countries might not get it! I also think the same logic applies for people who need electronic visas, where no interview is required, except from the customs guys upon arrival.

Anyway, as long as you already obtained the visa, then the chances of being asked again at the immigration/customs are low.

BTW, I work for a multinational company, many of the employees are required to have a US visa for business trips (hundreds) and that's my source. Also, I have been to all countries in the aforementioned list and I was asked the reason behind my visits but I always was granted the visa.

  • 8
    Yeah, they're worried about the person who goes there for terrorist training, not merely that you visited the country. Commented May 4, 2014 at 13:58
  • 4
    @LorenPechtel I am not sure your comment is appropriate. Commented May 4, 2014 at 13:58
  • 5
    Are you sure about Bahrain? I've had no problem, no questions asked, multiple trips.
    – PatrickT
    Commented May 4, 2014 at 14:38
  • 6
    @MeNoTalk I'm explaining WHY they care about those patterns. A travel pattern that is the sort of thing a terrorist might do will likely draw their scrutiny. Commented May 4, 2014 at 15:22
  • 5
    @MeNoTalk I'm sure Loren's question is appropriate.
    – greg
    Commented May 5, 2014 at 14:45

Technically, I don't believe that the US has a list of countries that would automatically disqualify you from entry if you have visited them. However, immigration officers have a large degree of discretion when it comes to denying entry to non-citizens. If you are unfortunate enough to run into an ignorant, prejudiced, or suspicious agent at the border, then you may be in for an unpleasant trip.

Anecdotally, there is an example of a Dutch visitor who was harassed as a suspected terrorist due to passport stamps from Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, Yemen, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi.

  • 7
    Yemen jumps off the page on that list. I think it was probably just Yemen. Commented May 4, 2014 at 13:14
  • 3
    Sri Lanka.. oh no why?
    – AKS
    Commented May 5, 2014 at 17:00
  • @AyeshK Something to do with the recent civil war maybe. Commented May 5, 2014 at 18:13
  • 1
    Singapore? Why?
    – user626528
    Commented May 9, 2014 at 17:45
  • 5
    @user626528 That is just a list of stamps that happened to be in his passport. Not all of them were responsible for triggering suspicion. According to the story, the agent interrogated him about Sri Lanka and Yemen. Commented May 9, 2014 at 17:52

Subsequent to this question being asked, the US has changed the Visa Waiver Program rules such that people who visited Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria on or after 1 March 2011, or are dual nationals of those countries, must apply for visas even if they are of a nationality that would normally be granted a waiver. In addition, people who've visited Libya, Somalia and Yemen (but not dual nationals of those countries) are also disallowed from the VWP like this.

That doesn't directly affect you, but it may serve as an indicator of which countries are viewed negatively.

  • 2
    Also, dual nationals of those four countries may not use the VWP. Since that restriction was put in place, three countries have been added: Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. People who have visited these countries may not use the VWP, but, unlike with the first four countries, being a national of one of these countries is not disqualifying.
    – phoog
    Commented Mar 18, 2016 at 9:22
  • 4
    @AndrewGrimm could you perhaps consider rewording this answer. The US has not banned people categorically, it disallows use of the VWP. While that is what you say in the end, it's not how your answer reads at first glance.
    – CGCampbell
    Commented Mar 18, 2016 at 18:46
  • @phoog I've edited the answer. Thanks for that information!
    – Golden Cuy
    Commented Mar 19, 2016 at 12:09
  • @CGCampbell I've edited it to be less confusing.
    – Golden Cuy
    Commented Mar 19, 2016 at 12:09

As a practical and comforting example, I had been to Lebanon, Qatar, Oman and Jordan and maybe some other "questionable" countries (such as Yemen that is mentioned in another answer, but not including Iran from your list) before visiting the US last year, and that did not cause any trouble. Admittedly, I had obtained a fresh passport in the meantime, but it would be naive to assume the US officials did not have all my past travel details at hand. In fact this time the immigration procdure was much less thorough investigation than a previous time when I entered USA from Canada by bus long ago (early nineties).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .