85

As an example, "Frankfurt" Hahn is actually 120 km away from the city of Frankfurt and "Paris" Beauvais is actually 85 km away from the center of Paris. Are there airports that are even further away from the center of the city they supposedly serve? To clarify:

  • Only airports with an IATA code count
  • The airport brand must either contain the name of the city or be called as such in advertisements published by a scheduled airline
  • Distance to the city center should be calculated as a direct line

12 Answers 12

91

I nominate Paris Vatry airport. 147 km from Paris.

Don’t even think there’s a direct link to Paris...

  • 9
    "A regular bus service is provided between the airport and the towns of Reims and Châlons-en-Champagne. ... Would you like to travel to PARIS from the airport or the opposite? ... Use a Vatry-express shuttle to reach the stations of Châlons-en-champagne or Reims Center and then take the train to Paris" – John Dvorak Apr 29 at 19:52
  • 59
    The tagline on that website is “So Close. So Fast”. o_O – Roman Odaisky Apr 29 at 20:10
  • 39
    It's closer to Belgium than it is to Paris – OganM Apr 29 at 23:35
  • 13
    @gerrit The airport's home page is parisvatry.com and that page also calls it Paris Vatry, so the marketing is pretty strong here. – lambshaanxy Apr 30 at 11:16
  • 9
    As an American, I'm thinking, huh, about 90 miles. Doesn't seem that far. – Apologize and reinstate Monica Apr 30 at 15:35
60

The defunct Ciudad Real Airport, also marketed as "South Madrid Airport", is/was about 200 km (227km from the Puerta del Sol, the official distance) away from Madrid

33

It just fails to beat your 'Frankfurt' Hahn, but Lydd Airport is also called London Ashford Airport, even though it's 117 km from central London. Given usual traffic conditions, that's probably a longer drive with a car than from Hahn to Frankfurt.

  • 27
    Given that "London Oxford Airport" is about 100km from London in virtually the other direction, there may be a booby prize of the city with the widest airport name catchment. – origimbo Apr 29 at 19:20
  • 11
    @gparyani given that “London Ashford Airport Ltd” is a subsidiary company which appears neither to have nor to have ever had any purpose other than running this single airport - which is closer to Calais than it is to London - I think you’re being rather generous to suggest that’s a meaningful difference. – Chris H Apr 29 at 20:37
  • 3
    @ChrisH I'm not sure. If you go to the airport's website, the logo says "LYDD London Ashford Airport" but the domain is www.lydd-airport.co.uk and the text only ever talks about "Lydd Airport", "Flying into Lydd" and even "fly owners with their pets directly to Lydd Airport [...] rather than to busy London Airports." Even the operator doesn't call the airport "London Ashford". – David Richerby Apr 29 at 21:34
  • 1
    @origimbo London would be doing quite well even without Lydd given London Southend Airport around 50 km ENE. I haven't checked a straight-line distance but Google walking directions say it's 100 miles from London Oxford. But Lydd's own website has "London Ashford Airport" in the logo, and more importantly it seems that it's listed by ICAO as "Lydd/London Ashford" (according to plenty of secondary sources). A different ChrisH to the one above – Chris H Apr 30 at 8:57
  • 3
    There was also the London Prestwick Airport incident :D – Fahad Sadah May 1 at 12:23
26

It's a bit of a cheat, but Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (BZN) is approximately 150 km from the geographic center of Yellowstone National Park. Of course, Yellowstone National Park is huge; the closest point in the park is "only" about 75 km away as the crow flies, while the farthest point is about 200 km away. The park headquarters are 96 km from BZN.

Similarly, as pointed out by @user71659, Fresno Yosemite International Airport (FAT) is approximately 105 km as the crow flies from Yosemite Village. This is perhaps a bit less of a cheat than the Yellowstone case, since while there is not a town called "Yellowstone" in Yellowstone National Park, there is a town called "Yosemite Village" in Yosemite. (This does stretch the definition of a "city", of course.)

  • 20
    The question also specifies "city", which the Yellowstone National Park isn't. – John Dvorak Apr 29 at 19:48
  • 8
    Similarly Fresno Yosemite International (the famous FAT) is 96 miles/154 km from Yosemite Valley. – user71659 Apr 29 at 20:31
  • 1
    the airport is actually on the outskirts of Bozeman itself, so definitely doesn't qualify. – jwenting Jul 30 at 4:21
16

Not going to win, but another that’s over 100km from the city with the same name is Stockholm Skavsta Airport which is 106km by road to the Stockholm city center.

  • 1
    Don't forget that Stockholm-Västerås airport is 103 km away and Arlanda 40 km away so the average distance for Stockholm's three airports is 83 km. Must be some kind of record too (if you include Bromma - that only offers domestic flights - that number is reduced to 65 km). – d-b May 1 at 10:23
  • I never thought of it being that far. At least there's a very stable bus shuttle service. – Ludwik May 1 at 10:57
  • The express train is more expensive than the bus (but cheaper than a taxi) and cuts the trip down to 15 or 20 minutes or something. Swedes complain that Arlanda is so far away but honestly, with that express train it hardly seems very far, and I'd take that over a similar trip to almost any airport in the US. – L0j1k May 1 at 11:32
  • @L0j1k thing with Arlanda is that it's techically part of Stockholm's transport area, so you can go there with your yearly ticket, but it's excruciatingly long, and you have to take a train and then a bus, while the express's return ticket is 30 or 40$. Sure if you come once in Stockholm it's okay, but if you live there and take the plane reasonably often, it becomes expensive quite fast – Nico May 1 at 13:58
  • 1
    Stockholm Bromma actually has several international flights, so it should be counted too.. – SAS May 2 at 10:35
10

The distance

According to Google Maps, the distance from Bangkok to U-Tapao is upward of 170 kilometres by road, as shown in the screenshot below. The direct distance, as pointed out in a statement by Eva Air (in the quote below, in bold) is about 140 kilometres. enter image description here

The future

There are plans for U-tapao Rayong-Pattaya Airport to become Bangkok's third airport. According to The Blue Swan Daily:

The Royal Thai Navy, operator of Utapao Rayong-Pattaya International airport, recently unsealed tender bids for the USD9 billion redevelopment of the facility under the Thai Government’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) scheme.

Its summary of the article lists:

Utapao will ultimately take its place as a ‘Bangkok’ airport, but one dedicated to tourists as it serves nearby Pattaya.

The past

It's not completely unprecedented for flights to Bangkok to head to U-Tapao. In 2008, when both of Bangkok's main airports were closed, some airlines chose to direct their flight there. From web.archive.org's capture of the Eva Air website (emphasis is mine):

Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok is still closed, so EVA Air changes flight schedule to Bangkok and Europe. EVA Air temporarily take Utapao Airport for the operation for flights to and from and via Bangkok.

Utapao is located approximately 140 kilometres and south from Bangkok. However, facilities at Utapao are very basic and the airport is heavily congested, we apologise in advance for the inconvenience, but ask for your understanding that the airport at Utapao is originally designed for military purpose.

It wasn't just Eva Air that decided to move it's flights, it has, for some time, been Thailand's main airport. From Wikipedia:

With the temporary closure of Suvarnabhumi Airport and Don Mueang Airport in late November 2008 because they had been occupied by anti-government protestors, U-Tapao became for a time Thailand's main supplementary international gateway. Many airlines arranged special flights to and from U-Tapao to ferry international passengers stranded by the closure of the Suvarnabhumi Airport.

As you can imagine, this caused quite a few problems (from the same Wikipedia link):

As many as 100,000 passengers were stranded in Thailand until early December. Although its runway can accommodate large aircraft, U-Tapao's terminals are not designed to handle more than a few flights a day. Travellers were subject to many hardships, and as the security was not up-to-date, some US-bound flights were diverted to Japan and their passengers required to go through a supplementary security check before continuing.

  • Do they actually plan to include "Bangkok" in the name of the city though? – JonathanReez Supports Monica May 1 at 18:38
  • 1
    @JonathanReez according to the article I cited, it will be referred to as 'Bangkok Airport', but I don't think anything has been officially decided yet. And given the fluidity of things, decisions could easily change. I thought it was interesting enough for an answer though. – JJ for Transparency and Monica May 1 at 18:42
  • You may not copy the google map here. Better use openstreetmap with proper attribution. – Jonas Stein May 3 at 18:47
9

Once upon a time, Penzance (SW England, IATA code PZE, although pretty much just an airstrip) briefly advertised itself as "London Penzance", despite being 306 miles (492km) from London.

I can't find a link, but it was poking fun at the likes of "London Luton" (56km), "London Stansted" (61km), which claim to be alternatives to London City (13km), Heathrow (24km) and Gatwick (45km).

9

I'm going to nominate Anadyr airport in Russia's far North-East.

Now, it's only 10 km from the town, but it is on a different side of the bay and there are no roads between airport and the town it serves.

DYR

Not a problem in winter, since the bay will freeze and allow driving over. But between seasons, I think it's not uncommon when you can't reach airport from town or vice versa for days or weeks, since the weather is brutal. There is an option to commute to airport with helicopter, which will again depend on weather.

7

Not going to win, but the Lhasa Gonggar Airport (LXA) is 97km away from downtown Lhasa. Nevertheless, it is going to win in one aspect: it is the only civilian airport serving Lhasa, making Lhasa the most distant city to any airport among all the cities that have been mentioned.

A new airport is under construction in Lhasa to allow easier access to the city center...and the new airport is 70 km away from downtown Lhasa. The main problem here is that Tibet is too mountainous and it is hard to find a large enough expanse of flat land suitable for an airport.

6

Not going to win, but Manchester Boston Regional Airport is about 44 mi (71 km) from the center of Boston (approximate straight-line measurement using Google Maps).

Ryanair's "Oslo" airport (TORP Sandefjord) is 87 km (54 mi) from the center of Oslo.

In general, I'd expect Ryanair's destinations list to include lots of good candidate answers to this question.

  • 4
    "44 miles from the center of Boston", and nealy 3200 miles from Manchester! – Bilkokuya May 2 at 16:17
  • @Bilkokuya But Manchester to Boston is just 187 km... – gerrit Jul 24 at 7:33
  • It may be 44 miles straight line distance, but the sign as you leave MHT says it's 57 miles driving distance. Only on rare occasions will it actually take only an hour to drive... – Michael Hampton Jul 30 at 8:03
2

Stewart International Airport has been renamed on Feb 21, 2018 to New York Stewart International Airport. It is 72.9 miles from the center of New York City according to Google Maps.

It comes to mind because it's in my hometown.

1

Not going to beat the other answers, but I wanted to throw in Weeze Airport anyhow, as it was supposed to be named "Düsseldorf-Weeze", but a court blocked the name due to the distance of 60km (Wikipedia claims 83km, the distance on road) from Düsseldorf.

Ryanair still calls it Dusseldorf-Weeze, however - I almost fell for it some time ago.

  • 1
    Google Flights also lists it under Düsseldorf, Germany when you type dusse. ;) – JJ for Transparency and Monica May 2 at 15:53
  • 1
    Hmm, why did ze Germans allow Frankfurt, but blocked Dusseldorf? – cnst Jul 31 at 2:20
  • @cnst because they like Frankfurters, but don't like DusselDorfers? – FreeMan Jul 31 at 15:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.