22

I have heard that British Airways provides free stopover in London i.e. a flight by British Airways via London costs the same as two separate flights from departure city to London and from London to destination city. So does Airfrance with Paris. Also I have recently seen an ad in subway about free stopover in Iceland from Icaelandair. Do you know more elsewhere, especially in Asia?

Improve this question
5
  • I've had a free stopover on almost every overseas flight I've taken in the past 22 years on many airlines and I've never had a paid stopover.
    – hippietrail
    Jul 23, 2011 at 12:36
  • Turkish Airlines, on the return leg in Istanbul. A worthwhile stop, the city is great. Technically not in Asia, but they have extensive Europe-to-Asia routes.
    – dbkk
    Jul 23, 2011 at 20:43
  • @hippietrail How long a stopover are you speaking about? A few days? Weeks? Or is this question more about layovers?
    – Astor Florida
    Aug 2, 2016 at 6:00
  • @axsvl77: I only edited the question. It was asked by puri.
    – hippietrail
    Aug 2, 2016 at 6:46
  • @axsvl77: Oh sorry. I used to get one or two weeks typically.
    – hippietrail
    Aug 3, 2016 at 1:21

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
23

Most airlines don't charge extra for stopovers (in fact, more often, they charge less, because the route is less convenient than a non-stop flight). They like to advertise "free stopovers" to make you think this is a great benefit they are giving you.

For example, if you are flying from New York to Dubai, the rich business traveller is going to want to take Emirates nonstop. Since Emirates is the only airline operating that route nonstop, they can charge whatever they want (it's showing as $2270 right now). Meanwhile, British Airlines, Qatar, Air France, KLM, United, Delta, and Royal Jordanian would all love to take your money on that route, but they can't do it nonstop, so they offer cheaper fares (now showing $1186-$1782) with connections in their home airports (London, Doha, Paris, Amsterdam, Washington, Atlanta, and Amman, respectively). And they will all be happy to let you stay over in their home town for a day or six without extra charge if it induces you to tolerate the connection.

enter image description here

Since very few people actually WANT to go to Iceland, and connecting in Reykjavik is hardly anybody's idea of a good time, Icelandair has to advertise "Free Stopovers" to induce people to think this is a great bargain and a fun thing to do.

IN FACT, in many cases, you will find cheaper fares from A->B->C->B->A than you will find from A->B->A, because of the premium placed on nonstop travel.

To find "free stopovers", just do an online search for your end point, and look at the various connection cities that are available. (Hipmunk does a good job of this). Then if you want to book it, redo the search as a multilegged trip and you should see that the calculated fare is the same or even cheaper depending on travel days.

So for example, if you want to see what stopovers are available from New York to Dubai, you do the search in Hipmunk and you'll see various flights connecting in London, Doha, Paris, Amsterdam, Washington, Atlanta, and Amman. So now you can search for multi-legged journeys from New York to Paris to Dubai to New York and the fare should come out similar to the Paris connection option. (I actually just tried that and saw that it was about $30 more, which is probably just an airport tax).

The best stopover options are in major cities where large airlines have their hubs. So even though Lufthansa isn't advertising anything on the New York to Dubai route, I'm pretty sure that I could search for New York - Frankfurt - Dubai - New York and find a fare that was pretty cheap compared to the New York - Dubai nonstop. (I just tried that and it was $800 less to stop in Frankfurt than to go nonstop, and only $100 more than the cheapest connection).

If you are planning to stopover anyway, that may create an opportunity to travel on Tuesday or Wednesday when fares are lowest.

Improve this answer
8
  • Thanks. That's new to me. However, when I tried to search for flights from A->B->C->B->A instead of A->C->A via B, the former seems more expensive.
    – puri
    Jul 23, 2011 at 2:39
  • where are you searching?
    – Joel Spolsky
    Jul 23, 2011 at 3:52
  • 2
    Good point. This only works if you stick with the same airline or at least the same "alliance".
    – Joel Spolsky
    Jul 23, 2011 at 4:42
  • 5
    Oh, hmm, you're right. That's probably because there is no nonstop from JFK-BKK, so the airlines with the connections don't have to sweeten the deal by allowing free stopovers. As proof -- if you were travelling from LAX, Cathay Pacific would let you stop over in HKG at no extra charge, because there is a nonstop Thai flight from LAX that they compete with.
    – Joel Spolsky
    Jul 23, 2011 at 6:05
  • 3
    I did that Reykjavik stopover. It was a total blast!
    – Mims H. Wright
    Jul 30, 2011 at 16:53
12

In 2017/2018 there are many changes:

  • people DO want to go to Iceland as it became a hot spot recently. IcelandAir discontinued their famous "stopover buddy program" but you could still take advantage of a free stopover. There are several budget airlines like WOW air which you could use to organize your own stopover in Iceland.
  • Qatar is giving away a free visa and hotel with your stopover (1 night for economy and 2 for premium classes)
  • Emirates also offers a stopover in Milan as well as in Dubai. enter image description here

We did a lot of fact-checking and put this up-to-date list of airlines offering free stopovers: https://www.flystein.com/free-stopovers/

Disclosure: I am co-founder of Flystein.

Improve this answer
0
8

Agree with Joel for the most part - playing with kayak or hipmunk will reveal all sorts of crazy routes and deals. Two days ago I was seriously considering getting from Mongolia to London by taking a flight to China, or even via Dubai, as flying with multiple airlines on strange routes was working out cheaper, and I enjoy flying :)

However, the next day a new one popped up - it was cheaper to fly to Moscow with airline A, wait 6 hours, and switch to Airline B for the flight to London.

And then yesterday when I came to book, Aeroflot had dropped their prices so it was cheaper to just go Mongolia to Moscow to London with them alone.

I wanted to go to Egypt from London at short notice a few years ago, and found using FOUR airlines to get there and back, it worked out cheap:

LON -> Brussels (had a few hours and an overnight there to check out the city)

Brussels -> Cairo (arrived a couple of days before my tour, so checked out Alexandria as well)

Cairo -> Cologne (amazing cathedral, have been back twice since)

Cologne -> London

Meaning I got to see two extra cities AND save myself a LOT of money than I would have by just searching LON -> CAIRO.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .