I recently bought some advance train tickets. Three days before departure the departure/arrival was rescheduled (or the timetable changed) for the train to depart/arrive 40/39 minutes later.

Shortly before the rescheduled departure the departure was delayed an additional 30 minutes. The train then accrued a further 60 minutes and a few seconds of delays on the way.

So in total I arrived 129 minutes (2:09) later than expected. The train operator sent out links for claims, saying the delay was 89 minutes, not counting the train being rescheduled a few days before (and claiming the train arrived before it had come to a stop, but never mind, this isn't the Shinkansen). Which to be honest is quite good of them.

I think with three days warning that is OK, but I was curious at what point (how close to the departure) would rescheduling a train actually count as a delay? This is for the Eurostar, but I guess the question is general for UK trains.

  • I've missed out on delay repay because I delayed the start of my journey rather than wait for a train that wasn't going to come: I was "only 56 minutes late" despite being an hour and a half late for work, and compensation kicks in at an hour on that route. There's a clause to say you have to actually be at the station in time to catch the train if it arrived. Obviously you're not likely to be at the station 2 hours early for your train if you've been given 3 days warning. So that ru;e may apply. But it may be different for Eurostar anyway. Commented Jan 29, 2018 at 16:54

2 Answers 2


tl;dr: once it's booked, they should honour it or compensate (except in the case of not-at-fault delays on a minority of operators)

This is for the Eurostar, but I guess the question is general for UK trains

Nope. In fact, many of the franchised national rail operators are different to each other, let alone Eurostar.


Eurostar's have a delay compensation policy, which is set out in more detail in their conditions of carriage. The pertinent section, which sets out your rights for compensation, is section 33. In 33.3, we find the following (emphasis added):

33.3 You will not be entitled to compensation under paragraph 33 where you are informed of a delay before you purchase your ticket or where a delay due to re-routing or continuation on a different service remains below 60 minutes.

This appears to be a case of exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis (the exception confirms the rule in cases not excepted); thus, if you do not fall under the exception of being informed prior to purchase, you are covered.

Please note, however, the general exceptions in section 35. These can be (broadly) summarised as no refund being due when circumstances are outside the control of the rail industry, when the passenger is at fault and in a few edge cases I can't see occurring on Eurostar (e.g. journey entirely outside EU).

We also need to consider section 17. This sets out your rights for rebooking/cancellation in the event of a timetable change after booking. It also contains the following exclusion:

We do not guarantee the train times to you and they do not form part of your contract of carriage with us. It is your responsibility shortly before you travel to check for any changes to the timings for your train.

First, it's important to note that section 17 does not make any provision to override or invalidate 33, so I think you should still be covered under that. I think this exclusion exists to stop you suing them for breach of contract and consequential losses in the event of such changes. It may also be significant that the exclusion is from the contract of carriage, not the conditions of carriage, so I don't think that will have any bearing on the applicability of 33.3. However, it would be interesting to hear from anyone that has experience of having tried this.

Finally, we have this favourable rule in the preamble, supporting the belief that 13.3 prevails over 17:

Where there are any inconsistencies within these Conditions of Carriage, the condition more favourable to the passenger will apply

These rules implement/are subordinate to the PRR and the CIV, so you have any rights which may arise under those and could enforce them against Eurostar if they do not comply. You would also have access to the standard (un)fair trading/consumer protection etc. rules of the country in which you booked.

Consequently, it seems that any ticket rescheduling after you have booked constitutes a delay; thus, if you do travel, you will be entitled to the regular compensation. The delay time quoted in the automated email may well be as innocent as the rescheduling falling through the cracks in their computer system - if it makes a material difference to a claim, I would recommend speaking to them in person/on the phone/via email.

Franchised Operators

This includes most (but not all) domestic rail services in Great Britain. The compensation specifics vary between train operators, but (apart from the older franchises, like GWR) most are now on some variant of the "delay repay" scheme. On this scheme, you are entitled to a sliding scale of compensation, increasing as the delay increases, whatever the cause of the delay. For some operators, this kicks on on delays as short as 15 minutes.

Some franchises are not yet on this scheme, and have less generous compensation arrangements. GWR, for instance, do not compensate for delays "outside [their] control". They also have different arrangements for season ticket holder than the delay-repay operators. For the rest of this discussion, uncited statements come from GWR's passenger charter; it should be representative of the least generous operators.

Advance tickets can be purchased up to 12 weeks in advance; planned engineering works are booked at least 12 weeks in advance. Thus, they will be known about when you book your ticket, so no schedule change required. (I can see an edge case, if you can buy a 30 day open return for outward travel in 12 weeks time - I don't know if you can do that, but I think you'd take the risk of engineering works in that case; this is also the case for long-duration season tickets.) Emergency/short notice engineering works count as a delay, the same as any other. Delay-repay operators should repay, for others it depends (e.g. if the works were to repair vandalism, you wouldn't be covered, but if to fix faulty points, you would be). In addition, you may be entitled to cancel your travel plans for a full refund, even where the ticket doesn't usually allow this.

National Rail Enquiries has links to the compensation rights and passengers' charters for all train operators.

Open Access Operators

A small minority of services on the national rail network are operated by open access operators - these are train companies that pay for access to track/facilities, rather than operating under contract to DfT. These include Grand Central, Hull Trains and Heathrow Express. In theory, these are a law unto themselves, but in practice I think they're comparable to their franchised brethren. Check the relevant operators websites for details.

  • I think the Eurostar section is incorrect. See eurostar.com/uk-en/conditions-carriage section 17. Commented Mar 21, 2018 at 22:14
  • @MarkPerryman Section 17 just sets out your rights re rebooking/cancellation. Section 33.3 seems to include anything that happens after ticket purchase as compensatable (via an exception that proves the rule). I think the strongly worded exclusions in 17 just stop you suing them for breach of contract, limiting their liabilities for consequential losses. Will try and edit the post, when I have a moment, to refer to sections 17 and 33 of the CoC. Commented Mar 21, 2018 at 22:25
  • 1
    I think they say that if it is rescheduled before the date of travel, you have the right to cancel your journey, but not to any compensation as it is not a 'delay' because they are not committed to the time. 'Delay' payments only apply if it arrives later than the scheduled time (which is thus changeable up to the date of travel), rather than the initially booked time (which is explicitly not guaranteed) [At least that is my reading of it.] Commented Mar 22, 2018 at 6:30
  • 1
    I've rewritten the Eurostar section to be explicitly based on their conditions of carriage. I've elaborated the logic of why these seem to point to rescheduling constituting a delay and discussed section 17 in more detail. It would be interesting to hear from people who have had experience trying to push such a claim, or knowledge of consumer/travel law on the matter. Commented Mar 22, 2018 at 11:45

I believe the existing answer to be wrong with respect to Eurostar, so I will add this one.

The train time displayed on your ticket or in our timetables may change between the date you purchase your ticket and the date you actually travel. We do not guarantee the train times to you and they do not form part of your contract of carriage with us. It is your responsibility shortly before you travel to check for any changes to the timings for your train.

I believe that this means that a rescheduling of times DOES NOT constitute a delay and thus the delay compensation does not apply. It implies that such a change can occur up to the date you actually travel.

If the train is rescheduled, then you do have additional rights to a refund if you choose not to travel (or wish to travel on a different train), but not to delay compensation if you do.

Section 33 - Compensation for Delay

This paragraph 33 applies where cancellation or delays affecting train services covered by your transport contract with Eurostar mean that you experience a delay between the place of departure and destination under that contract of more than 60 minutes

As this applies to delays covered by your contract, and section 17 excludes rescheduled train times from that contract, I believe there to be no contradiction.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .